Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Peterson, et al. v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue, et al.
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETERSON, JAY STICKNEY, BEAU WATSON and others
Defendant:
SNOHOMISH REGIONAL FIRE AND RESCUE and KEVIN O'BRIEN, Chief
Troy Matthew Gleason v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Troy Matthew Gleason and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ybarra v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2023cv04097
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ybarra
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Ryan Joseph, Andy Orozco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moen v. Satterberg et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Daniel-William Moen
Respondent:
Daniel T. Satterberg, Julia Garratt, Ketu Shah and others
Johnnylee Burk v. Justin Blake, et al
as 23-35186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNYLEE PRESTON BURK
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BLAKE, RALPH BEISTLINE, SHARON GLEASON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Robert Gleason v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert Gleason
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A., Melvin Neeley, Jessica Casto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
