Cases 31 - 40 of 277
Miguel v. D & G Auto Repair, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv02663
Defendant:
D & G Auto Repair, Inc. and Glenn Pantore
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Miguel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wade v. Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00851
Defendant:
Helix Well Ops Inc. and Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glenn Alan Wade
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glenn v Presbyterian Homes and Services
as 2:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Presbyterian Homes and Services
Plaintiff:
Katie E Glenn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fite v. Shamrock Foods Company et al
as 2:2021at00009
Defendant:
John Fernandes and Shamrock Foods Company
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fite v. Shamrock Foods Company et al
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
John Fernandes and Shamrock Foods Company
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Glenn v. Florence Brewing Company LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03836
Defendant:
Hans Prahl and Florence Brewing Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Sarah Glenn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glenn, Katie v. Presbyterian Homes and Services
as 3:2020cv01036
Plaintiff:
Katie E. Glenn
Defendant:
Presbyterian Homes and Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Corrina Martin v. CB Restaurants, Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv01334
Counter Plaintiff:
Teresa Thompson, Glenn Williams, CB Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Sugar's Gentlemen's Club and others
Plaintiff:
Corrina Martin, Brenda Tagle and Briana Bass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nicholson v. Sacolo, LTD. et al
as 5:2020cv01319
Defendant:
Sacolo, LTD. doing business as Perfect 10 Men's Club San Antonio, John Hester, Glenn Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Whitney Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgos v. Mac Mechanical Co et al
as 4:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Mac Mechanical Co and Daniel Glenn McElderry, II
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Burgos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
