Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Dunlap v. Yoder et al
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Glenn Dunlap
Defendant:
Nicholas Yoder, Andrew Elwell and Eric Mitchel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v Haleighs Hope, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Sydney Williams
Defendant:
Haleighs Hope, Inc., Jamie L Bramblett, Glenn Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grinage v. State of Wisconsin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul Grinage
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Corporation, David G Miron, DeShea D Marrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calvert v. City of Garrett et al
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Glenn Calvert and Glenn L. Calvert
Defendant:
City of Garrett, Roland McPherson and Garrett City of
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
The Estate of Gavin Wallmow v. Oneida County
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Gavin Wallmow
Defendant:
Oneida County, Glenn Kortenhof, Ian Conkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLENN v. LEXIS NEXIS
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
VICTOR L. GLENN
Defendant:
LEXIS NEXIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Craig Stingley v. Glenn Yamahiro, et al
as 22-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG L. STINGLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN YAMAHIRO, JEFFREY A. CONEN, HANNAH C. DUGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
