Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Daugherty v. Holbrook et al
as 3:2019cv05918
Petitioner:
Ronald Glenn Daugherty
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook, Robert W. Ferguson and Robert W Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norling v. Uttecht
as 4:2019cv05189
Petitioner:
Bo Glenn Norling
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norling v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv05697
Petitioner:
Bo Glenn Norling
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knisley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv06054
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Glenn Knisley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boyle et al v. City of Puyallup et al
as 3:2018cv05750
Plaintiff:
Jerome Connolly, Christian Rainey, Glenn Humphreys and others
Defendant:
Pierce County and City of Puyallup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Glenn
as 2:2018cv01289
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Respondent:
Thomas Glenn
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
3M Company, Tyco Fire Products LP, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Ackerman , Susan Bakos , Phyllis Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fischel v. Fox Chiropractic, P.S. et al
as 2:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Glenn P Fischel
Defendant:
Fox Chiropractic, P.S. and Darcy K Fox
Counter_claimant:
Fox Chiropractic, P.S. and Darcy K Fox
Counter_defendant:
Glenn P Fischel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Walker v. Kapstone Paper and Packaging Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv05977
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Walker
Defendant:
Kapstone Paper and Packaging Corporation and Longview Fibre Paper & Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
