Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Manczak v. Global Client Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv07987
Defendant:
Global Client Solutions, LLC , Global Holdings, LLC and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Manczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv05510
Plaintiff:
DORA SMITH
Defendant:
LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, LLC , GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC , MACEY & ALEMAN HYSLIP & SEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Debttrack, LLC et al v. Fluid Trade, Inc.
as 1:2011cv11667
Defendant:
Fluid Trade, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debttrak, LLC and Global Client Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manczak v. Global Client Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv06177
Plaintiff:
Karen Manczak
Defendant:
Global Client Solutions, LLC , Global Holdings, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harry E Beck v. GHS Solutions LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Harry E Beck
Defendant:
Does, GHS Solutions LLC and Global Client Solutions LLC
Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv03228
Plaintiff:
Heather L Newton
Defendant:
American Debt Services, Inc, Global Client Solutions, LLC, Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03228
Plaintiff:
Heather L Newton
Defendant:
American Debt Services, Inc , Global Client Solutions, LLC , Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mohammad Bahadori v. Global Client Solutions LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Bahadori
Defendant:
DOES and Global Client Solutions LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
