Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Natural Dog Acquisition LLC v. Pet Go Round of Greensboro
as 3:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Natural Dog Acquisition LLC
Defendant:
Pet Go Round of Greensboro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Teleco Inc v. Tele Go Inc
as 6:2021cv01900
Defendant:
Tele Go Inc doing business as TELEGO
Plaintiff:
Teleco Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Alflahy's Get N Go, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Alflahy's Get N Go, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Shellfish To Go II, Inc. v. Dirty Dick's, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shellfish To Go II, Inc.
Defendant:
Dirty Dick's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
The Ellen G. White Estate, Inc. v. Knudson et al
as 8:2012cv02448
Plaintiff:
The Ellen G. White Estate, Inc.
Defendant:
Brendan P Knudson, Webs, Inc. , HostGator.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In-N-Out Burger v. Grab-N-Go Burgers
as 1:2011cv02296
Plaintiff:
In-N-Out Burger
Defendant:
Grab-N-Go Burgers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Go Fit LLC v. GOFIT.COM
as 1:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
Go Fit LLC
Defendant:
GOFIT.COM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pan-American Products & Holdings, LLC v. R.T.G. FURNITURE CORP. et al
as 1:2010cv00508
Plaintiff:
Pan-American Products & Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
R.T.G. FURNITURE CORP., Roomstogo.Com, Inc., ROOMS TO GO NORTH CAROLINA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Air China Limited v. Tran et al
as 1:2009cv01288
Plaintiff:
Air China Limited
Defendant:
Troung Duy Tran, Northwest Bakery, Inc., Neustar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
DECORO USA LTD. v. R.T.G FURNITURE CORP., et al
as 1:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
DECORO USA LTD.
Defendant:
R.T.G. FURNITURE CORP. and ROOMS TO GO NORTH CAROLINA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
