Cases 1 - 10 of 11
US v. Kenneth Godsey
as 23-4487
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH ROBERT GODSEY
Thaddeus Cosby v. Town of Farmville
as 21-1384
Defendant / Appellee:
H. A. HOYLE, JR., Individually and in his Official Capacity as an Officer of the Farmville Police Department, THE ESTATE OF TIMOTHY M. BOURNE, OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY FOR PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THADDEUS DARNELL COSBY
US v. Kenneth Godsey
as 16-4772
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH ROBERT GODSEY, a/k/a K. God, a/k/a Ken God
Godsey v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02190
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Godsey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godsey v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv18292
Plaintiff:
Teresa Godsey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godsey et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv04638
Plaintiff:
Lisa Godsey and Scott Godsey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Showalter v. Gene Johnson
as 09-8141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK TODD SHOWALTER
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC, TRACY RAY, Warden, ROSP, J. W. ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden ROSP and others
Godsey v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00130
Movant:
Kenneth Robert Godsey
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
US v. Kenneth Godsey
as 08-5072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH ROBERT GODSEY
Dunkley v. Tate et al
as 7:2007cv00465
Petitioner:
Virgil Clayton Dunkley, III
Defendant:
D. Tate and Godsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
