Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Goines v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Sarah Goines
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28653
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gouge Goin
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28652
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Goin
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24701
Plaintiff:
Caroline Stevens , Sandra Foley , Linda Barnhill and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goines v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06851
Plaintiff:
Amie Howlett Goines
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05067
Plaintiff:
Amy Howlett Goins
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv03571
Plaintiff:
Sharon Goins and Gary Goins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. ICG Beckley, LLC
as 5:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
Steven Darrell Smith
Defendant:
ICG Beckley, LLC , Keith Goins and Joseph Tussey
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Goins v. Fayette County Court et al
as 2:2013cv22141
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Goins
Defendant:
Fayette County Court, Oak Hill Court, Mt. Hope Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14750
Plaintiff:
Denise Goin and Michael J. Goin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
