Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shyvers v. Gollogly et al
as 2:2012cv00959
Petitioner:
Kim Lawrence Shyvers
Respondent:
Vincent Gollogly, Mark Adire and Ben Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shyvers v. Adire et al
as 2:2012cv00865
Plaintiff:
Kim Lawrence Shyvers
Defendant:
Mark Adire and Ben Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Krause et al
as 2:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Kenneth Krause, Ben Klinger, Albert Machhour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holtz v. Terry et al
as 3:2012cv05110
Plaintiff:
Ronald Holtz
Defendant:
Terry, Vincent Goldsmith and Pierce County Detention and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Pierce County Sheriff et al
as 3:2011cv05754
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Locke
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff, Vince Goldsmith, Mary Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv05448
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Murphy
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Pierce County Jail Medical Care Center, Carlos Ortiz-Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarrer et al v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05670
Plaintiff:
Larry Tarrer and Raymond Garland
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Martha Karr and others
Nguyen et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv01233
Plaintiff:
Tam Minh Nguyen and Hoang Kim Vo
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Justice, Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerde v. Goldsmith
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Steven Jerde
Defendant:
Stephen Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
