Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Gomez Portorreal v. USA - DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL PLEADINGS TO BE FILED in 22cr10156-PBS.
as 1:2023cv13169
Petitioner:
Santiago Gomez Portorreal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez v. Westside House of Worcester
as 4:2023cv40117
Plaintiff:
Ricardo B Gomez
Defendant:
Westside House of Worcester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez v. USA
as 1:2023cv10917
Petitioner:
Carlos Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez-Alvarado v. Town of Westborough, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2023cv40008
Plaintiff:
Romeo Gomez-Alvarado
Defendant:
Town of Westborough, Massachusetts, William Kearney, Clifford Luce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gomez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10382
Plaintiff:
Raul J. Gomez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv40144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Norris v. Moroney et al
as 1:2022cv10660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Norris
Defendant:
GloriaAnn Moroney, Kevin Devlin, Frederick Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
