Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonsalves v. Rodrigues
as 1:2022cv11994
Petitioner:
Antwan Gonsalves
Respondent:
Michael Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Choroszy v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv11507
Plaintiff:
Zygmunt Choroszy, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie, Rachael Sartini, Vicent W Ng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Baez et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2020cv10753
Petitioner:
Jonathan Bermudez, Jermaine Gonsalves, Anthony Baez and others
Respondent:
Antone Moniz, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonsalves v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 12-cr-10344-PBS
as 1:2019cv10030
Petitioner:
Stanley Gonsalves
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Evanston Insurance Company v. Gonsalves,et.al.
as 1:2017cv11398
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Alessandro Gonsalves, Smart Choices Services, Inc., Christopher Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almonte v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv11865
Plaintiff:
Sauel S. Almonte
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Douglas Varano, Nicholas D. Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gonsalves v. Town of Falmouth et al
as 1:2012cv12164
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonsalves
Defendant:
Town of Falmouth, Civil Service Commission of Massachusetts, Anthony Riello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Gonsalves
as 1:2011mc91118
Respondent:
David Gonsalves
Petitioner:
United States of America
Gonsalves v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2010cv11778
Petitioner:
Brandin Gonsalves
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
