Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gould v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2022cv30116
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Land Court Department, Judge Gordon H. Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cichocki, et al v. Town of Rehoboth, et al
as 13-1664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD CICHOCKI and Y. DOLLY HWANG
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH, 2006-2012 Board of Selectmen, ROBERT ASHTON and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and GORDON H. PIPER
Cichocki, et al v. Town of Rehoboth, et al
as 13-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD CICHOCKI and Y. DOLLY HWANG
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH, 2006-2012 Board of Selectmen, ROBERT ASHTON and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and GORDON H. PIPER
Cichocki, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 13-1398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD CICHOCKI and Y. DOLLY HWANG
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH, 2006-2012 Board of Selectmen and others
Defendant:
ROBERT ASHTON, GT EXCAVATING CORPORATION and GEORGE KELLUM
Cichocki, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 13-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY E. CICHOCKI and Y. DOLLY HWANG
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and GORDON H. PIPER
Defendant:
TOWN OF REHOBOTH, TOWN OF REHOBOTH, 2006-2012 Board of Selectmen, ROBERT ASHTON and others
Cichocki et al v. Commonwealth of Mass et al
as 1:2012cv12010
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Cichocki and Y. Dolly Hwang
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Mass , Town of Rehoboth , 2006-2012 Board of Selectman, Town of Rehoboth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
