Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 254
Perry v. Government Employees Insurance Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00910
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Perry
Defendant: Government Employees Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Sood et al
as 1:2022cv03825
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Rahul Sood, D.O., Sood Medical Practice, LLC, Mid-State Anesthesia Consultants LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02639
Defendant: JULIA IOFFE, M.D., CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC doing business as ACUPUNCTURE & CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC OF N.J., TAE YOUNG HONG, D.C., L.AC. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant: CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC et al
as 2:2022cv02481
Defendant: HEALTH MEDICAL REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C., NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC, JORGE MENDEZ, M.D. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. doing business as MOUNT PROSPECT HEALTH CENTER, TERRY MCSWEENEY, D.C., HASSAN MEDICAL PAIN RELIEF AND WELLNESS CENTER LLC doing business as HASSAN SPINE AND SPORTS MEDICINE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BERGER, D.C. et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: PETER BERGER, D.C., HAWTHORNE PAIN & SPINE CENTER, LLC, JON-PAUL DADAIAN, M.D., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ronald Panella, M.D. et al
as 8:2022cv00321
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Ronald Panella, Best Care Medical Group, Inc., Jorge Consuegra and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC, Sangwoo Mah, D.C., Seung-Hyuk Choi, P.T. and others
Not Classified By Court: David P Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ADVANCED SPINE & PAIN MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00319
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: ADVANCED SPINE & PAIN MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, NICHOLAS ROSANIA, D.C., VARINDER DHILLON, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Casillas-Brito v. Serrano-Vazquez et al
as 3:2022cv01033
Plaintiff: Elvis Casillas Brito and Elvis Casillas-Brito
Defendant: Brenda Serrano Vazquez, Arnaldo Hernandez Otero, Hernandez Vazquez Conjugal Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?