Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rogers v. Kemp et al
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rogers
Defendant:
Gov. Kemp, Commissioner Oliver, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, Ct. L. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Littlejohn et al v. William et al
as 1:2023mi00002
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dewayne Littlejohn and Jerome Bell
Defendant:
Colonel William, Craig Owens, Chief Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Colonel Wiliams et al
as 1:2022cv05167
Plaintiff:
Ahday Nelson
Defendant:
Colonel Wiliams, Wessenberger, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Kent Tyrik Robinson
Defendant:
Cobb County, Sheriff Craig Owens, Colonel Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Labat and Governor Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv04487
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Governor Kemp, Judge Oliver, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
