Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Reed v. Smart et al
as 6:2019cv03348
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Vice Presidents of Missouri State University, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, et al v. Eric Schmitt, et al
as 19-1948
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, Michael L. Parson, Governor of Missouri and Keith Hendrickson, Acting Supervisor of the Missouri Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, doing business as Magnum Wine and Tastings, Michael Schlueter, Terrence French and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Governor of Missouri
as 19-1900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Governor of Missouri
Demos v. Governor of Missouri
as 4:2019cv00862
Defendant:
Governor of Missouri
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Smith v. Barack Obama
as 08-5455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley Paul Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, President, Barack Obama, President, United States Senate and others
Ricky Rollins v. Matt Blunt
as 08-1122
Plaintiff:
Ralph T. Wilmas, Jr. and John Doe, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ricky Rollins, Alex A. Mason, Cornelius Williams, Jr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin Dudley, Samuel Smith and Lonnie Wolford
Defendant - Appellee:
Matt Blunt, Governor of Missouri, Official and Individual Capacity, Steve Long, Missouri Parole Board Chairman, Official and Individual Capacity, Wayne Crump, Parole Board Member, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Movant - Appellant:
Nathan Roper
George Cron v. The Board of Governors of Miss
as 07-3423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George P. Cron
Defendant - Appellee:
The Board of Governors of Missouri State University, Rhythm McCarthy and Jay Raphael
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
