Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Columbus Malone, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic doing business as Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Columbus Malone, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02539
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, danita woods, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brenda Williams, Christa Cook, Christopher Derick Montgomery and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Perry
as 1:2022cv01100
Petitioner:
Montez Adams
Defendant:
Warden Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guevara v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Lizandro Guevara
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pence v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Zachary J Pence
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frelix v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Brian C. Frelix
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howse v. Perry, Warden
as 3:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Rev. Curley Howse
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Perry
as 1:2022cv01010
Petitioner:
Curtis Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
