Cases 21 - 30 of 48
United States of America v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Allied Waste Industries, Inc., E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Watts v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 2:2015cv13418
Plaintiff:
Kamaria Watts
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wagner v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 2:2015cv10635
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wagner
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballard v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv13956
Plaintiff:
Brad R. Ballard
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Anthony Durso v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
as 14-1836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DURSO
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Joseph v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv14340
Plaintiff:
Dixon T Joseph
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv14307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Consolidated Rail Corporation, et al v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
as 13-2269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Third Party - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Turner v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
as 13-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
