Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant:
ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamal Parker v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor Beneficiary a a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior et al, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Attorney General et al, ANDREW SAUL, d/b/a Commissioner et al and others
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Higgins v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09714
Plaintiff:
Mark Rock Higgins, Higgins Family Trust d/b/a Mark Rock Higgins etc. and Mark Rock Higgins Estate, Beneficiary
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams, Polk Sheila Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Haaland
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jamal Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Dept. of the Interior, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Parker v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv08107
Plaintiff:
Jamal Parker
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
