Cases 1 - 10 of 498
Green v. Residential Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Marcia Michelle Green
Defendant:
Residential Acceptance Corporation, Village Capital & Investments, LLC, DHI Title-Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Dixon v. The Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Dixon
Defendant:
The Texas Department of Public Safety, Homeland Security Investigations, Air Force Office of Special Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Greene v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Samantha E. Greene
Defendant:
Officer Bryan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Cotton et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rodriguez
Defendant:
Officer FNU Cotton and Corporal Augustus Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Bossier et al
as 5:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Tonya Mann and Tonya Mann-Oliver
Defendant:
City of Bossier, Julian Whittington, Daniel Haugen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Rose et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Dominick Green
Defendant:
R Rose, C Pabst, City of Mesquite TX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harvey v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Robert Edwin Harvey
Defendant:
Officer Jentry Cotten and Corporal Augustus Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pertee v. Risher
as 24-10027
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bruce Pertee
Defendant:
David Risher, CEO Lyft, Incorporated, Logan Green, CEO Lyft President, Chris Lambert, CEO Lyft and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
