Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Padilla v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Texas Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. #176 Judicial Dist., Ct. et al
as 3:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Carlos Macias
Defendant:
#176 Judicial Dist., Ct., Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Ct., Texas Prison Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co, Greg Abbott, Lana Mcdaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Paxton et al
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept Director et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Tx. Parole Dept Director and Greg Abbott
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co and #203rd Dist CT of Dallas Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv01594
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Depts. and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2019cv01115
Defendant:
Henry Wade, Greg Abbott and City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Director of Texas Prison System et al
as 3:2019cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Director of Texas Prison System, Senior Warden, Director of University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
