Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Russell County Department of Human Resources et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson and Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Russell County Department of Human Resources, Alabama Attorney General Office, Greg Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Nancy Buckner, Stephanie Glisppe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Ward et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Williams
Defendant:
Greg Ward and Carl Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennard v. Rowe et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carson Lee Kennard, II
Defendant:
Carl Rowe and Greg Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Ward et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Greg Ward, Carl Rowe, Ben Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherch v. Ward, et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 1:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cherch
Defendant:
Greg Ward , Carl Rowe , Geneva County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Rowe et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Hernandez Contreras
Defendant:
Carl Rowe, Greg Ward and Shataya Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Conner et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Rickey Robinson
Defendant:
Ryan Conner, Leroy Upshaw and Greg Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
