Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claybon v. Dallas County District Attorney
as 22-11186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas County District Attorney
Claybon v. Dallas County District Attorney
as 3:2022cv02185
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant:
Dallas County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Claybon v. Gatlin
as 22-10342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Andrew Gatlin, "Drew", District Attorney and Laura Anne Coats, District Attorney
Claybon v. Dallas County Criminal Court #1 et al
as 3:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant:
Dallas County Criminal Court #1 and Dallas District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. The City of El Paso et al
as 3:2011cv00151
Defendant:
Gregory Allen, Raul Ramirez and The City of El Paso
Counter Defendant:
Darren Hunt
Plaintiff:
Darren Hunt
Counter Plaintiff:
Raul Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Velasquez et al v. The City of El Paso, Texas et al
as 3:2010cv00457
Defendant:
Officer S. Adams, Gregory Allen, Sgt. B. Audirsch and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Velasquez and Guadalupe Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
