Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gregory Rowe v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-3236
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALAN ROWE
Gregory Rowe v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 21-1996
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND J. TONKIN, Pike County District Attorney and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY ALAN ROWE
Rowe v. SCI-Albion et al
as 3:2020cv02032
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Rowe
Defendant:
Superintendent of SCI-Albion and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Supt. Albion SCI
as 3:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Supt. Albion SCI
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Rowe v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 19-1744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY ALAN ROWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Gregory Rowe v. Ruben Gonzalez, et al
as 18-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
RUBEN GONZALEZ, State of Texas Judge, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BRENDA H. DUMAS and others
Gregory Rowe v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-1650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ALAN ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY
Gregory Rowe v. Ruben Gonzalez, et al
as 14-11078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
RUBEN GONZALEZ, State of Texas Judge, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BRENDA H. DUMAS and others
Rowe v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Rowe
Defendant:
Ruben Gonzalez, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Brenda H Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowe v. Giroux et al
as 3:2013cv02444
Petitioner:
Gregory Alan Rowe
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
