Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Bourque v. Marion County Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
James Ryan Phillips, Sherry Prince, Julie Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Jayne Bourque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truist Bank v. The Stache Company, LLC et al (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00023
Defendant:
JASON T JONES, THE STACHE COMPANY, LLC, WILLIAM TRAVIS GRIFFITH and others
Plaintiff:
TRUIST BANK, successor-in-interest to SUNTRUST BANK and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Griffith, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv00382
Defendant:
James H. Griffith, Jr. doing business as CJ's Sports Bar and Lisa Lesley
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
James H. Griffith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hebig v. Lebovitz et al (JRG2)
as 1:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, Richard J. Lieb, Augustus N. Stephas and others
Plaintiff:
david p hebig
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kemmer v. Lebovitz et al (JRG3)
as 1:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Gary L. Bryenton, Augustus N. Stephas, Richard J. Lieb and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kemmer
Shebitz v. Lebovitz et al. (JRG3)
as 1:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, Gary J. Nay, John D. Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Shebitz
McNalley v. Griffith
as 2:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Alex Griffith
Plaintiff:
Nathan McNalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Oakley Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Thomas Weir, Oakley Pharmacy, Inc., John Polston and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Kelly v. Dozier et al
as 3:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Kelly
Defendant:
Steve R. Dozier, J. Wesley King, Elain Ann Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
