Cases 1 - 10 of 22
POWELL v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
SHARON K. POWELL
Defendant:
RYAN WOOTEN, STACEY VERSAW, ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
George Miller, James J. Cirellli, Joseph Grillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grillo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2020cv00821
Defendant:
Superintendent McGinley, Security Lieutenant Burns, Security Captain Mirarchi and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eugene Grillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00280
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, SCI Waymart, Paul DelRosso and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TURNER v. U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
TWANITA TURNER
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC. , U.S. XPRESS, INC. and ROBERT GRILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glover v. Horvath et al
as 1:2013cv02729
Plaintiff:
Walter Glover
Defendant:
P. Horvath, S.C.I. - Waymart Mailroom, Laura Banta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON et al
as 2:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KRAMER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, THE NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPT., ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
