Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Valdez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Norma Flores Valdez
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Nicholas Oswald, Brandon Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farnsworth v. Mesa Fiesta Street Crime Unit et al
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jody D Farnsworth
Defendant:
Mesa Fiesta Street Crime Unit and B Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago #115357 v. Coca et al
as 4:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Earl F Crago
Defendant:
Gene Coca, S Grissom, Hope Ping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopson v. Alexander et al
as 2:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Markeiss Hopson
Defendant:
Unknown Grissom and J Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02589
Plaintiff:
Rion Steven Price
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department , Cory McDowell, Brandon M Lavin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romero v. Bencomo et al
as 4:2009cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sean Romero
Defendant:
Loretta Bencomo, Toni Morales and B. Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2007cv02245
Petitioner:
Robert Kenneth Berry
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Arizona Attorney General, State of, Tiffany Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
