Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Richard Villaescusa et al v. GrubHub Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08030
Plaintiff:
Richard Villaescusa and Alexandre Torres Pereira
Defendant:
GrubHub Holdings Inc., GrubHub, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Levine v. Grubhub Holdings Inc., et al
as 22-1131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LEVINE, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated and STEPHEN LEVINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
GRUBHUB HOLDINGS INC. and GRUBHUB INC.
Levine v. Grubhub Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11742
Plaintiff:
Stephen Levine
Defendant:
Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace et al v. GrubHub Holdings Inc.
as 1:2018cv04538
Defendant:
GrubHub Holdings Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carmen Wallace and Broderick Bryant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raef Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 18-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAEF LAWSON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, and in his capacity as Private Attorney General Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC. and GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
Thomas Souran, et al v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc., et al
as 17-1320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS SOURAN, KELLY REARDON, ROY WILKIE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. and GRUBHUB, INC.
Souran et al v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06720
Plaintiff:
Thomas Souran , Kelly Reardon , Roy Wilkie and others
Defendant:
Grubhub Holdings, Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tan and Raef Lawson
Defendant:
Grubhub, Inc. and Grubhub Holdings Inc
Interested Party:
Caviar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Hakima Mitchell v. GrubHub Inc.
as 2:2015cv05465
Defendant:
Does and GrubHub Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hakima Mitchell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
