Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rescap Liquidating Trust v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp
as 16-12048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RESCAP LIQUIDATING TRUST, Delaware Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tallahassee
RESCAP LIQUIDATING TRUST v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 4:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
RESCAP LIQUIDATING TRUST
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tallahassee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEM 2Q, LLC et al v. GUARANTY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv06117
Plaintiff:
LEM 2Q, LLC and LEM 2P, LLC
Defendant:
GUARANTY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY , ROBERT J. VOEGEL , ROBERT R. ROTHSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. Madoff et al
as 3:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ellis, Dr. Lamar Ellis Charitable Remainder Trust, Lamar Ellis' Trust and others
Defendant:
Bernard L. Madoff, Investment Securities LLC, Pioneer Investment Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FTC v. NBC, et al
as 2:1989cv01740
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
National Business Consultants, Inc. , Robert Namer , Namer Inc and others
Movant:
Robin Acrey , Hugh Garner , Rachel Hendricks and others
Garnishee:
Deposit Guaranty National Bank , First National Bank of Commerce , America First Communications, Inc. and others
Trustee:
Robert L Marrero
Claimant:
Robert Namer
Receiver:
Claude C Lightfoot, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Allen, et al v. Regions Bank
as 09-60705
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH ALLEN and MINNIE ALLEN
Defendant - Appellant:
REGIONS BANK, a successor of First American National Bank, operating as Deposit Guaranty National Bank and UNION SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE CO, a foreign corporation
Amicus Curiae:
MISSISSIPPI BANKERS ASSOCIATION
In re: Comm Bank N VA
as 08-3791
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REBECCA A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, ROBERT A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, RUTH J. DAVIS, a lawfully married couple and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DAVIDSON, ANTHONY DIXON, KATHY DIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tennessee, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO and PNC BANK NATL ASSOC, successor to CBNV
Defendant:
COMM BANK N VA and GRNTY NATL INS CO
In re: Comm Bank N VA
as 08-3857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REBECCA A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, ROBERT A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, RUTH J. DAVIS, a lawfully married couple and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY ELLIOTT, LORRAINE OSWALD and RUTH D. MATHIS-WISSEH
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tennessee, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO and PNC BANK NATL ASSOC, successor to CBNV
Defendant:
COMM BANK N VA and GRNTY NATL INS CO
In re: Comm Bank N VA, et al, et al
as 08-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALABAMA AND GEORGIA OBJECTING CLASS MEMBERS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REBECCA A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, ROBERT A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, RUTH J. DAVIS, a lawfully married couple and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tennessee, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO and PNC BANK NATL ASSOC, successor to CBNV
Defendant:
COMM BANK N VA and GRNTY NATL INS CO
In re: Comm Bank N VA
as 08-3621
Plaintiff:
PHILIP F. KOSSLER and JEANNIE C. KOSSLER, a lawfully married couple, individually as on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OBJECTING CLASS MEMBERS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REBECCA A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, ROBERT A. CLARK, a lawfully married couple, RUTH J. DAVIS, a lawfully married couple and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO, PNC BANK NATL ASSOC, successor to CBNV and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty National Bank of Tennessee
Defendant:
COMM BANK N VA and GRNTY NATL INS CO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
