Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Anderson et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10680
Plaintiff:
Damian Anderson, Mitch Bartholomew, Guy Beaver and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P.M.S. Diversified Construction Services, LLC v. It's The Brick Guys, LLC
as 5:2023cv11424
Plaintiff:
P.M.S. Diversified Construction Services, LLC
Defendant:
It's The Brick Guys, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Whittaker et al v. Biesinger et al
as 2:2022cv11535
Counter Defendant:
Aaron Whittaker, Southern Cross Investments, LLC and GPH Services, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Kenneth Biesinger and The Accounting Guys LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tatar v. Cole et al
as 2:2021cv11512
Defendant:
Donald C. Nugent, Denise Page Hood, Richard Loury and others
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Tatar and John Tatar [E-filer], II
Guy #251862 v. Rewerts
as 1:2021cv00485
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Ashanti R. Guy #251862
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cardwell v. RPM Wholesale & Parts, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv10831
Defendant:
Guy A. Parsons and RPM Wholesale & Parts, Inc
Plaintiff:
Kyler Cardwell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
