Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Howard v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Daron Durane Howard, Daron Durane Howard-Bey, Daron Dwane Howard and others
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Steven T. Marshall, Thomas Hugghins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitt v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Levar Dixion, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Gwendolyn Babers, Alan Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, CRPN Aplinlin, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Officer Rivers, Officer Reese, Brandon Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Kareem Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Babers et al (INMATE 3)

as 2:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonds v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, D. Whitley, D. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Bullock Medical Department, Warden McClain, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
Chez D. Rice
Defendant:
Captain McCovery and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.