Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cary v. State of Florida
as 3:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Cary, III
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. NV Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Nv Dept of Corrections, Charles Daniels, H Cary and others
Plaintiff:
Damon R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Walter H. Cary, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cary v. Daniels et al
as 3:2019cv01138
Defendant:
Chris Coldiron and Daryl Daniels
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Cary, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary et al v. State of Florida
as 3:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Williamson, Gerald A. Reedy, Kiarle Williams and others
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Cary, III v. Detention Jett, et al
as 19-10483
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, official capacity and DETENTION DEPUTY JETT, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER H. CARY, III
Cary v. Mathews et al
as 3:2019cv00159
Defendant:
State Of Florida and Det. Mathews
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Cary, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Matthews et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Respondent:
State of Florida and CCSO Detective Matthews
Petitioner:
Walter H. Cary, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cary v. Jett et al
as 3:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Detention Deputy Jett and State Of Florida
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Cary, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
