Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, H M Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
W Nettles, R Carter, J Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PENICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2012cv00341
Defendant:
JULIE ANN BEIGHLEY, H. LAPPIN, H. M. MARBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD PENICK
Name Unknow:
PRISON CONTRACT OPTOMETRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Billy Birdwell, II v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, N. GRANNIS, R. SUBIA and others
Larry Banks v. Hector M. Fuentes, et al
as 12-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY M. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
H. M. FUENTES, Peace Officer, Chicago Police Department (#11396) (pcot69) and I. R. LOPEZ, Peace Officer, Chicago Police Department (#13516) (pcoy103)
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
