Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04849
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walgreen CO et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2023cv13061
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO, The Kroger Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023mc00339
In Re: Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
Petitioner: Walgreen Co., Kroger Co., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC. and others
Respondent: TruPharma LLC
Bailey v. Blue Cross
as 23-20205
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jason R. Bailey, MD, P.A. and Lone Star Surgical Partners, P.A.
Defendant / Appellant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Incorporated, Enterprise Products Partners, L.P., also known as Enterprise Products Operating, L.L.C., TechnipFMC USA, Incorporated, formerly known as FMC Technologies, Incorporated and others
Type: Contract Insurance
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-410
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
H-E-B, L.P. v. Ningbo Kuer Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00066
Plaintiff: H-E-B, L.P.
Defendant: Ningbo Kuer Plastic Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo Kuer Kayak Co., Ltd., Ningbo Kuer Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Microstrategy Services Corporation v. HEB Grocery Company, LP
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff: Microstrategy Services Corporation
Defendant: HEB Grocery Company, LP, H.E. Butt Grocery Company and H-E-B, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?