Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HERNANDEZ v. TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST et al
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO A. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST, PAUL F. HAGGERTY, MICHAEL CARRINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crystal Weimer v. County of Fayette, et al
as 22-2363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTAL DAWN WEIMER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY, NANCY VERNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD HAGGERTY, JR. and BEVERLY ASHTON, in their individual capacities
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS CESARIO
PLETCHER et al v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01361
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY PLETCHER, JOSIAH KOSTEK, NICHOLAS CONLEY and others
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC. and C&J GROCERY CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv14953
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENBERG v. HAGGERTY et al
as 2:2020cv03822
Defendant:
JOHN F. CORDISCO, JERRY M. LEHOCKY, JOHN C. RAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAPIER v. HAGGERTY et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Defendant:
STEPHANIE HAGGERTY, ANDREW THOMAS and KAREN LORD
Plaintiff:
THERESA NAPIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv15306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
