Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shiyang Huang v. Brian Spector, et al
as 20-10249
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, a foreign limited liability company, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, TRUSTED ID, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM R. PORTER, JAMES MCGONNIGAL, RANDOLPH JEFFERSON CARY, III and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHIYANG HUANG, CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, ALICE M FLOWERS and others
Amicus Curiae:
JAY EDELSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brian Spector, et al v. Harald Schmidt, et al
as 20-14095
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, EQUIFAX, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM R. PORTER, JAMES MCGONNIGAL, RANDOLPH JEFFERSON CARY, III and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARALD SCHMIDT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schmidt v. McAllister
as 1:2015cv01050
Plaintiff:
Harald Schmidt
Defendant:
Michelle McAllister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger
as 15-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARALD SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN HUNSBERGER and JOHN BURK
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE
Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger
as 14-2216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARALD SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN HUNSBERGER and JOHN BURK
Schmidt v. Hunsberger
as 1:2014cv01372
Plaintiff:
Harald Schmidt
Defendant:
Steven Hunsberger
Consolidated_defendant:
John Burk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Burk
as 1:2014cv01373
Plaintiff:
Harald Schmidt
Defendant:
John Burk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
