Cases 1 - 10 of 49
MARRERO v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
TITO E. MARRERO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, JENIFER WRIGHT, SHARON MIDDLEBROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TECKENBROCK v. SEIBOLT et al
as 1:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WAYNE TECKENBROCK
Defendant:
SEIBOLT, JACK SADDLER, BRIDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Barry Harding v. Specialty Risk of America
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Barry Harding doing business as Office Lounge
Defendant:
Specialty Risk of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HARDING v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
STEVEN T. HARDING
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HARDING v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
as 1:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
HEIDI HARDING
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
