Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
King's Hawaiian Holding Company, Inc. et al v. Southern Bakeries, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv04283
Plaintiff:
King's Hawaiian Bakery Southeast, Inc., King's Hawaiian Holding Company, Inc. and King's Hawaiian Bakery West, Inc.
Defendant:
Harlan Bakeries, LLC, Does 1-10, Inclusive and Southern Bakeries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
James Johnson v. Harlan Bakery, et al
as 15-3669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLAN BAKERY, LUIS CORTEZ, DENNIS JOHNSON and others
JOHNSON v. HARLAN BAKERY et al
as 1:2015cv01035
Defendant:
DAVID COFFIN, LUIS CORTEZ, HARLAN BAKERY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. HARLAN BAKERIES, LLC
as 1:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant:
HARLAN BAKERIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
