Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv04973
Plaintiff:
Harold King
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35168
Plaintiff:
HAROLD KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01784
Plaintiff:
Harold King
Defendant:
Wildcat Service Corporation and Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04363
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Chris Williams v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-10993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, HAROLD KING, County Commissioner, CURTIS BLOOM, Officer of P.P.D and others
Williams v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Chris Williams
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddley v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Casey Leon Riddley
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rick O Jackson, Chris Williams and Casey Leon Riddley
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Harold King, Curtis Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
