Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Zoukis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. Zoukis
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Corine Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Viands v. Laybourn et al
as 1:2014cv00506
Plaintiff:
Wayne O. Viands
Defendant:
Katherine Laybourn, Eric Wilson, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-7907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director F.B.O.P., HARRELL WATTS, National Inmate Appeals and others
Tucker v. Hufford et al
as 5:2013ct03292
Plaintiff:
Percy J. Tucker
Defendant:
Otisville Hufford, Harrell Watts, Charles E. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herbert Young v. Nicole Taborn
as 13-7768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT FRANCIS YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
NICOLE TABORN, RONNELL PRIOLEAU, TRACY W. JOHNS and others
Sykes v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Terrance Sykes, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, Christopher Goisse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Kazee et al
as 5:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lonnie D. Morris, Sr.
Defendant:
D. Kazee, J. Hoffman, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hairston v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Hairston, Sr.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Smith v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-6638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JONATHAN C. MINER, BRICK TRIPP and others
Young v. Taborn et al
as 5:2012ct03251
Plaintiff:
Herbert Francis Young
Defendant:
Nicole Taborn, Ronnell Prioleau, Tracy W. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
