Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hines v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Fox, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hatten v. Chadwick et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00998
Defendant:
John Crawford, Michael Chadwick, Cody Evan and others
Plaintiff:
Quincey Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Olson et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Wally Olson, Collins Painter, Lee Rodes and others
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Harrington et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2019cv00423
Defendant:
Valley Wood, Inc., Bobby Ray Harrington and Bobby Ray Harrington individually doing business as Timberline Wood Products
Plaintiff:
Yolanda R. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raybon v. Estes Enterprises, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Raybon
Defendant:
Estes Enterprises, Inc and Phillip Wayne Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrington v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Harrington
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jarrell v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
George Edward Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Davis, Shane Hamilton and Tyler Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate Flagship LLC et al v. Cypress Equities Southeast LLC et al
as 7:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
Pate Flagship LLC and Sealy LLC
Defendant:
Cypress Equities Southeast LLC, Christopher C Maguire, Scott Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
