Cases 41 - 50 of 1,032
Parker v. Hawkins
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Amber Lee Parker
Respondent:
T. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Fitch
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ricky Edward Hawkins
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruse v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Cruse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, Burl Cain, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Logan et al v. Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Pamela Logan, La-Rodriguez Logan and Rodriguez Logan
Defendant:
Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc. and Steven Leroy Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
USA v. Moran
as 23-60130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marco Bisa Hawkins Moran
Trevino-Alvarez v. Hawkins
as 4:2023cv00910
Petitioner:
Rosalinda Trevino-Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden T. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
