Cases 1 - 10 of 226
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Julius Hayes
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawn Hayes
Defendant:
Patrick White and Paul Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Hayward Hayes
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Deloris Hayes
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hinton et al v. Hayes et al
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Trevor Hinton and Timothy Hinton
Defendant:
Connor Hayes and Good Will Protection Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Baucom, Jr v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Terry Baucom, Jr
Defendant:
Core Civic, f/n/u Mitchell, f/n/u Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Jeff Hayes, Brett Cobble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Ebony Hayes
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
