Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NUNEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15592
Plaintiff:
HENRY NUNEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nunez v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2022cv02834
Plaintiff:
Joe Henry Nunez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NUNEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00833
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HENRY NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIVINE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03135
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK RUFO, NATHANIEL RENTZ, DAVID CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Divine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02104
Plaintiff:
Dominick Rufo, Nathaniel Rentz, David Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Nunez et al v. Ryjeff, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00775
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Jeffrey Lerman and Ryjeff, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Henry Nunez and James Williamson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nunez v. Offshore Marine Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Henry Nunez
Defendant:
Offshore Marine Contractors, Inc. and Falck Alford Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. et al v. Nunez et al
as 1:2010at00894
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. , Nelida Mendiola , Maria Nava and others
Defendant:
Henry Nunez and Minnie Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. et al v. Nunez et al
as 1:2010cv02073
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. , Nelida Mendiola , Maria Nava and others
Defendant:
Henry Nunez and Minnie Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
