Cases 1 - 10 of 13
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELA v. HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
RENE VELA
Respondent:
HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARNER v. HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DARNELL WARNER
Defendant:
HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCALES v. HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
DEBRIEL SCALES
Defendant:
HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scales v. Heritage Trail Correctional Facility
as 3:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Debriel Scales
Defendant:
Heritage Trail Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCALES v. HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
DEBRIEL SCALES
Defendant:
HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MONK et al
as 2:2019cv00171
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HALL v. HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv00516
Respondent:
HERITAGE TRAIL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
JAMES T. HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2018cv03656
Defendant:
LEFLORE, JOHNSON, INDIANA POLITICAL SUBDIVISION RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
