Cases 1 - 10 of 72
PASSMORE` v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. PASSMORE
Defendant:
CARTER, ZATECKY, PHEGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO C. GRIFFITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, HEATHER MILLS, BRENDA HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HINTON et al v. PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Hinton, Braden M Hinton, Thomas B Hinton and others
Defendant:
PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HINTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06872
Plaintiff:
PEGGY HINTON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MYNATT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00322
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, VANIHEL, NURSE COAKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JASON S. PERRY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DANA SKINNER, S. CRICHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. RAINS, PHAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARP v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
ANGELA BAKER, KEVIN DEW, RICHARD WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2021cv03031
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARCUS MAYBERRY
Defendant:
JACQUELYN GILBERT, BRENDA HINTON, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
