Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Ames Merchandising Corporation vs. Playmates Toys (HK), Inc.
as 2:2013cv06489
In Re Debtor:
Ames Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ames Merchandising Corporation
Defendant:
Playmates Toys HK, Inc.
In re: Ames Department Stores, Inc., et al
as 2:2013mc00237
In Re Debtor:
Ames Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ames Merchandising Corporation
Defendant:
Playmates Toys HK, Inc.
HKS Inc v. Green Acres LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02602
Defendant:
Barsocchini and Associates Inc, Does, Green Acres LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HKS Inc
Architectural Resources Group, Inc. et al v. HKS, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05787
Plaintiff:
Architectural Resources Group, Inc. and Ideas Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
HKS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Matthews v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv24424
Plaintiff:
David Matthews
Defendant:
Whitewater West Industries, Ltd. , HKS, Inc. , EDSA, Inc. and others
Mediator:
Peter Abraham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davalan Sales, Inc. et al v. TWO HK, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01158
Plaintiff:
Davalan Sales, Inc. and Davalan Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Harry Hyunchul Kim and TWO HK, Inc.
Baker et al v. Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv02342
Plaintiff:
Charlene Baker , William Kevin Flanigan and Leslie Flanigan
Defendant:
Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd. , AntbrenLLC , Antrand, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HKS, Inc. v. Ellerbe Becket, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02268
Plaintiff:
HKS, Inc.
Defendant:
Ellerbe Becket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Franks et al v. Balfour Beaty Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01189
Plaintiff:
John Franks and Brenda Franks
Defendant:
Balfour Beaty Construction, Inc., Baring Industries, Inc., Baring Industries of Electrolux Professional, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Judy Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
