Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Holiday et al
as 2:2019cv00140
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail, Corporal Roop, Ashley Holiday and others
Plaintiff:
Jermain Santell Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Brian Kenneth Belcher
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail, C. O. Holiday and Deshaun Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winning v. Webb et al
as 2:2017cv03855
Plaintiff:
Richard Winning
Defendant:
Webb, Terry, Holiday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. West Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2016cv04346
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Turner
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail Authority , Perry, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billings v. Cole et al
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Billings
Defendant:
Jonathan Cole, William Fowler, Joseph Hoffmaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holiday v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv03946
Plaintiff:
Dolores Holiday
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Defendant:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP et al
as 5:2015cv00016
Petitioner:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Respondent:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holiday v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29340
Plaintiff:
Leslie E. Holiday
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
