Cases 1 - 10 of 589
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Damper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Damper
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuslits, John et al v. Brown, Nicole et al
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Kuslits and Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Nicole Brown, Maryah Martin, Denise Valerius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Hodgeman, B. J. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN M. HOLMES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holmes et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Holmes and Michael Ball
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Pamela Holmes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holmes v. Sight et al
as 1:2023cv17013
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Holmes
Defendant:
Latilda Sight, Aaron Pennix, University of Chicago Woodlawn Charter School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16838
Plaintiff:
Darlene B Holmes
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oral USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
