Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Shenandoah Hills Wind Project, LLC v. Page County, Iowa et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Shenandoah Hills Wind Project, LLC
Defendant:
Page County, Iowa, Page County Board of Supervisors, Page County Board of Adjustment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Hunter et al v. Page County, Iowa et al
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
James Hunter, Sheri Hunter, Bradley Hutchison and others
Defendant:
Page County, Iowa, Board of Supervisors of Page County, Iowa, Alan Armstrong and others
Intervenor:
Shenandoah Hills Wind Project, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nasuti v. Holm
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matt Nasuti
Defendant:
Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Gibbs
as 6:2020cv02071
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Holmes and Thomas D Holmes
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Gibbs
as 6:2020cv02070
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Holmes and Thomas D Holmes
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Gibbs
as 4:2020cv00278
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Holmes
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Holmes v. Gibbs
as 4:2020cv00277
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Holmes
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. The Hartford
as 3:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dwight Douglas Holmes
Defendant:
The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Holmes v. Iowa, State of
as 3:2016cv03124
Plaintiff:
Michael D Holmes
Defendant:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
