Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Fisher et al
as 5:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Fisher, Mark Knutson, Cheri Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hood v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eizember et al v. Harpe et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Scott Eizember and Jeffrey Hood
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Jim Farris and Justin Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
Wade Lay
Defendant:
Officer Hood, Mr. Kirby, Lt. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
